20
service in that territory.
This being the case he is
pensionable
clearly ineligible for the payment of £149.10.0. from
Subhead F suggested in your official letter of 21st
December 1932, as this Subhead is available only to meet
payments which would have been made from Wei-hai-Wei
funds prior to the rendition in respect of prasulable
service in that territory. As the Colonial Office have
said that his service in that territory was not pension-
able I cannot understand why this payment from Subhead F
is now proposed, and should be grateful if you would
explain. I may add that I have made prolonged research
into the papers dealing with Russell Brown's appointment
to Wei-hai-Wei and cannot find any evidence that there
was any intention that this service was to be pensionable;
it appears indeed from other papers dealing with Wei-hai-
Wei that under the Pension Ordinance of that territory
there was no provision for the payment of pension to the
Commissioner.
Yours sincerely,
Ellley.
Page 20Page 21
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.